Royal Challengers Bangalore Royal Challengers
  • w
  • w
  • w
  • w
  • w
262-7 ( 20)
262-7 287-3 SUN won by 25 runs
Sunrisers Hyderabad Sunrisers
  • w
  • l
  • w
  • l
  • l
287-3 ( 20)
Started: 02 PM, Mon Apr 15 2024 Indian Premier League Venue: M.Chinnaswamy Stadium
Prev Royal Challengers RCB Next
Prev Sunrisers SRH Next

Commentary

  • 0' The match was played in Indian Premier League on Monday April 15.

Sunrisers

Inning 1 Runs Balls M. Fours Sixes Strike Rate
T. Head c F. du Plessis b L. Ferguson 102 41 0 9 8 249.0
H. Klaasen c V. Vyshak b L. Ferguson 67 31 0 2 7 216.0
A. Samad Not Out 37 10 0 4 3 370.0
A. Sharma c L. Ferguson b R. Topley 34 22 0 2 2 155.0
A. Markram Not Out 32 17 0 2 2 188.0

Fall of wickets: 1-108 (A. Sharma, 8.1 ov), 2-165 (T. Head, 12.3 ov), 3-231 (H. Klaasen, 16.6 ov)

Extras: Byes: 0, Legbyes: 2, Wides: 12, Noballs: 0, Penalties: 0

Bowling Overs Maidens Runs Wickets Economy
W. Jacks 3.0 0 32 0 10.67
R. Topley 4.0 0 68 1 17.0
Y. Dayal 4.0 0 51 0 12.75
L. Ferguson 4.0 0 52 2 13.0
V. Vyshak 4.0 0 64 0 16.0
M. Lomror 1.0 0 18 0 18.0

Royal Challengers

Inning 2 Runs Balls M. Fours Sixes Strike Rate
D. Karthik c H. Klaasen b T. Natarajan 83 35 0 5 7 237.0
F. du Plessis c H. Klaasen b . Cummins 62 28 0 7 4 221.0
V. Kohli b M. Markande 42 20 0 6 2 210.0
A. Rawat Not Out 25 14 0 5 0 179.0
M. Lomror b . Cummins 19 11 0 0 2 173.0
R. Patidar c N. Kumar Reddy b M. Markande 9 5 0 0 1 180.0
W. Jacks Run Out 7 4 0 1 0 175.0
V. Vyshak Not Out 1 2 0 0 0 50.0
S. Chuahan Lbw Out 0 1 0 0 0 0.0

Fall of wickets: 1-80 (V. Kohli, 6.2 ov), 2-100 (W. Jacks, 7.6 ov), 3-111 (R. Patidar, 8.6 ov), 4-121 (F. du Plessis, 9.3 ov), 5-122 (S. Chuahan, 9.6 ov), 6-181 (M. Lomror, 14.1 ov), 7-244 (D. Karthik, 18.5 ov)

Extras: Byes: 1, Legbyes: 0, Wides: 13, Noballs: 0, Penalties: 0

Bowling Overs Maidens Runs Wickets Economy
A. Sharma 1.0 0 10 0 10.0
B. Kumar 4.0 0 60 0 15.0
S. Ahmed 1.0 0 18 0 18.0
T. Natarajan 4.0 0 47 1 11.75
. Cummins 4.0 0 43 3 10.75
M. Markande 4.0 0 46 2 11.5
J. Unadkat 2.0 0 37 0 18.5

What's Your Take?

0 comments
Reply to