Match Report

Sunrisers Hyderabad Sunrisers
  • d
  • d
  • d
  • d
  • d
219-2 ( 20)
219-2 131-10 SUN won by 88 runs
Delhi Capitals Delhi Capitals
  • d
  • d
  • d
  • d
  • d
131-10 ( 19)
Started: 02 PM, Tue Oct 27 2020 Indian Premier League Venue: Dubai International Cricket Stadium
Prev Sunrisers SRH Next
Prev Delhi Capitals DEL Next

Commentary

  • 0' The match was played in Indian Premier League on Tuesday October 27.

Sunrisers

Inning 1 Runs Balls M. Fours Sixes Strike Rate
W. Saha c S. Iyer b A. Nortje 87 45 0 12 2 194.0
D. Warner c A. Patel b R. Ashwin 66 34 0 8 2 195.0
M. Pandey Not Out 44 31 0 4 1 142.0
K. Williamson Not Out 11 10 0 1 0 111.0

Fall of wickets: 1-107 (D. Warner, 9.4 ov), 2-170 (W. Saha, 14.3 ov)

Extras: Byes: 0, Legbyes: 7, Wides: 4, Noballs: 0, Penalties: 0

Bowling Overs Maidens Runs Wickets Economy
A. Nortje 4.0 0 37 1 9.25
K. Rabada 4.0 0 54 0 13.5
R. Ashwin 3.0 0 35 1 11.67
A. Patel 4.0 0 36 0 9.0
T. Deshpande 3.0 0 35 0 11.67
M. Stoinis 2.0 0 15 0 7.5

Delhi Capitals

Inning 2 Runs Balls M. Fours Sixes Strike Rate
R. Pant 36 35 0 3 1 103.0
A. Rahane Lbw Out 26 19 0 3 1 137.0
T. Deshpande Not Out 20 9 0 2 1 223.0
S. Hetmyer b R. Khan 16 13 0 3 0 124.0
S. Iyer c K. Williamson b V. Shankar 7 12 0 0 0 59.0
R. Ashwin c A. Samad b J. Holder 7 5 0 1 0 140.0
M. Stoinis c D. Warner b S. Nadeem 5 6 0 1 0 84.0
K. Rabada b T. Natarajan 3 7 0 0 0 43.0
A. Patel 1 4 0 0 0 25.0
A. Nortje 1 3 0 0 0 34.0
S. Dhawan c D. Warner b S. Sharma 0 1 0 0 0 0.0

Fall of wickets: 1-14 (M. Stoinis, 1.6 ov), 2-54 (S. Hetmyer, 6.1 ov), 3-55 (A. Rahane, 6.5 ov), 4-78 (S. Iyer, 11.3 ov), 5-83 (A. Patel, 12.5 ov), 6-103 (K. Rabada, 15.6 ov), 7-103 (R. Pant, 16.1 ov), 8-125 (R. Ashwin, 17.6 ov), 9-131 (A. Nortje, 18.6 ov)

Extras: Byes: 0, Legbyes: 4, Wides: 5, Noballs: 0, Penalties: 0

Bowling Overs Maidens Runs Wickets Economy
S. Sharma 4.0 0 27 2 6.75
S. Nadeem 1.0 0 8 1 8.0
J. Holder 4.0 0 46 1 11.5
R. Khan 4.0 0 7 3 1.75
T. Natarajan 4.0 0 26 2 6.5
V. Shankar 1.5 0 11 1 7.33
D. Warner 0.1 0 2 0 20.0

What's Your Take?

0 comments
Reply to
Loading