Match Report

West Indies National Cricket Team West Indies
  • d
  • d
  • d
  • d
  • d
304-2 ( 50)
304-2 310-6 SOU won by 4 wickets
South Africa National Cricket Team South Africa
  • d
  • d
  • d
  • d
  • d
310-6 ( 49.4)
Started:
Prev West Indies WES Next
Prev South Africa SOU Next

Commentary

West Indies

Inning 1 Runs Balls M. Fours Sixes Strike Rate
CH Gayle not out 152 153 220 12 3 99.35
S Chanderpaul c JA Rudolph b GC Smith 85 114 165 6 1 74.56
RL Powell not out 49 24 41 4 2 204.17
BC Lara c M Ntini b L Klusener 11 11 14 1 0 100.0
RR Sarwan 0 0 0 0 0 0.0
DR Smith 0 0 0 0 0 0.0
RD Jacobs 0 0 0 0 0 0.0
RO Hurley 0 0 0 0 0 0.0
M Dillon 0 0 0 0 0 0.0
R Rampaul 0 0 0 0 0 0.0
CD Collymore 0 0 0 0 0 0.0

Fall of wickets: 1-193 (S Chanderpaul, 38.3 ov), 2-212 (BC Lara, 41.3 ov)

Extras: Byes: 0, Legbyes: 1, Wides: 4, Noballs: 2, Penalties: 0

Bowling Overs Maidens Runs Wickets Economy
SM Pollock 10.0 2 47 0 4.7
M Ntini 7.0 1 41 0 5.86
A Nel 10.0 0 60 0 6.0
L Klusener 8.0 0 42 1 5.25
RJ Peterson 3.0 0 22 0 7.33
JH Kallis 4.0 0 39 0 9.75
GC Smith 8.0 0 52 1 6.5

South Africa

Inning 2 Runs Balls M. Fours Sixes Strike Rate
JH Kallis c S Chanderpaul b R Rampaul 139 142 197 11 3 97.89
GC Smith b CH Gayle 58 60 111 6 0 96.67
JA Rudolph c S Chanderpaul b R Rampaul 35 29 52 3 1 120.69
HH Dippenaar c R Rampaul b RO Hurley 28 37 40 1 0 75.68
HH Gibbs c RR Sarwan b CD Collymore 15 18 24 1 1 83.33
SM Pollock not out 12 3 9 1 1 400.0
MV Boucher not out 7 6 20 1 0 116.67
L Klusener c BC Lara b CD Collymore 4 5 5 1 0 80.0
RJ Peterson 0 0 0 0 0 0.0
A Nel 0 0 0 0 0 0.0
M Ntini 0 0 0 0 0 0.0

Fall of wickets: 1-31 (HH Gibbs, 5.6 ov), 2-133 (GC Smith, 24.4 ov), 3-187 (HH Dippenaar, 35.1 ov), 4-277 (JA Rudolph, 45.5 ov), 5-285 (L Klusener, 46.5 ov), 6-296 (JH Kallis, 48.4 ov)

Extras: Byes: 0, Legbyes: 7, Wides: 3, Noballs: 2, Penalties: 0

Bowling Overs Maidens Runs Wickets Economy
M Dillon 10.0 0 42 0 4.2
RO Hurley 9.0 0 56 1 6.22
CD Collymore 10.0 0 83 2 8.3
R Rampaul 10.0 1 56 2 5.6
CH Gayle 9.4 0 61 1 6.31
RR Sarwan 1.0 0 5 0 5.0

What's Your Take?

0 comments
Reply to
Loading