Dagger Shot

Dagger Shot Steph Curry

Dagger shot, or most commonly called the late field goal, is an expression used in Basketball that refers to how the team reaches out against their opponent to make a guaranteed victory. The player would figuratively pierce the dagger through their opponent’s heart to kill their chance of winning the game. Many players have been doing Dagger Shot, so they can intimidate the opposing team from winning. Eventually, the dagger shot needs to be executed aggressively by scoring multiple times in one round to make the opposing team think that they can never raise their hopes to championships.

History of the Dagger Shot

The Dagger is a basketball lingo, but it has a share of history too. This term was originally called “The Shot,” but Michael Jordan comes up with a new idea to shot a series of baskets, that created a dagger in their opponent’s hearts at that time. It’s also called “The Dagger” because even fans are mourning for their favorite team’s loss and the score differences, making it almost impossible for the opposing team to fight for the championship.

Famous Dagger Shot

As mentioned, Michael Jordan might have created this term with his performance at the court. Other players who can easily sweep their scores would be Stephen Curry, who made at least 48% shots for the team, that it’s not easy to throw a curse against him when he’s playing. Kobe Bryant and Lebron James are also team players who can easily sweep off the records by scoring an impossible score during the game. These players can make a momentum-killing, 3-point shot that kills the opposing team’s confidence in no time.

The Effects of the Dagger Shot

Dagger shots can be dramatic to a lot of fans because they’re hoping for their team to win but that’s not going to happen. When a series of successful shots are being thrown at the basket, it cannot be helped to think that there are no chances of winning. Dagger Shot has also used a psychological weapon, where the player can intimidate the opposing team to score.

What's Your Take?

0 comments
Reply to
Loading